From: | Thomas Dudziak <tomdzk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? |
Date: | 2005-08-09 21:19:16 |
Message-ID: | 224f323405080914194be16ac3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 8/9/05, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to extract the source tables from a result set for a
> > arbitrary select query. For this I use the
> >
> > ResultSetMetaData.getTableName(int columnIndex)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2005-01/msg00220.php
>
> Please see this message and the discussion referenced at the bottom of it
> for why we do not support getTableName, but instead provide a pg specific
> getBaseTableName method.
Ok, thanks, I see. However, from what I read in the thread the
question in the mail that you referenced, as to why
PGResultSetMetadata does not extend ResultSetMetadata, and as a result
the getTableName method is mapped onto getBaseTableName, is still
valid IMO. Especially if the information seems to be readily
available. Would you consider this change for an upcoming release ?
regards,
Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-09 21:19:48 | Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-08-09 21:12:36 | Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? |