Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf
Date: 2015-01-14 15:37:56
Message-ID: 22430.1421249876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The postgresql.auto.conf is loaded after loading of postgresql.conf
> whenever configuration file is loaded or reloaded.
> This means that parameter in postgresql.auto.conf is quite high
> priority, so the parameter in postgresql.conf does not work at all
> even if user set it manually.

> If user want to change stopped postgresql server then user need to
> merge two configuration file(postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf)
> while maintaining the consistency manually.

>> From an operational perspective having a written config with duplicate
> entries is not good thing.
> I think we need to merge two configuration file into one (or more than
> one, if it uses like 'include' word)

> The one solution is to add merging tool/commnand which merges two
> configuration file while maintaining the consistency.
> This topic have been already discussed?

Yes. The entire reason that postgresql.auto.conf is separate is that
we despaired of reading and rewriting postgresql.conf automatically
without making a hash of material in the comments. Calling the logic
a "merge tool" does not make that problem go away.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2015-01-14 15:47:19 Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2015-01-14 15:31:50 Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf