Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: problem with WAL files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem with WAL files
Date: 2005-06-30 22:31:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> writes:
> When I tested with our system, it would not attempt to retrieve that first WAL 
> via the restore command.  All the ones after that it was happy to do it for, 
> but if that one did not exist, it told me to get lost.

Would you be more specific please?  Looking at the code, I can't see a
reason that the first one would be treated differently from others.
What *exactly* did you get?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Jeff FrostDate: 2005-06-30 22:40:03
Subject: Re: problem with WAL files
Previous:From: Jeff FrostDate: 2005-06-30 22:03:46
Subject: Re: problem with WAL files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group