Re: parallel option in pg_restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>, John Rouillard <rouilj(at)renesys(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: parallel option in pg_restore
Date: 2010-06-23 14:40:11
Message-ID: 22370.1277304011@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Good point. No I've not seen it on a file smaller than 2GB, but the test I did was pretty basic - I just trimmed down the size of all of my tables to create a dump that was only 50Mb or so. It looks like Igor has a reproduceable case now though, so hopefully Tom can figure out what's going off.

I neglected to follow up to this -admin thread, but see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-06/msg01227.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2010-06-23 15:23:39 Re: parallel option in pg_restore
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-06-23 13:56:36 Re: Unable to start Statistics Collector