Re: Python 3.1 support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-18 17:50:33
Message-ID: 22366.1258566633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 12:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter was concerned about duplicative maintenance effort, but what I
>> think this patch shows is that (at least for the near future) both
>> could be built from a single source file.

> That seems reasonable if we can run both. Although I wonder if longer
> term (2.x is going to be support a long time) we will end up with
> frustration within the single source file trying to keep things
> straight.

Once it gets to the point where it's more trouble to keep them together
than not, we can split the source. But judging from this patch, a
single source file is the ticket for the moment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-11-18 18:26:14 Re: Timezones (in 8.5?)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-11-18 17:48:31 Re: Python 3.1 support