Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This seems rather poorly designed, mainly because there's no reason to
>> think that a single command would be sufficient.
> It supports multiple commands via multi-statement requests
> e.g.
> -x "SET this = on; SET that = off"
I don't believe that works for multiple \set commands, which is the
more likely use-case for this; as noted upthread, executing SET here
is quite unnecessary since you can get that behavior with
"export PGOPTIONS".
regards, tom lane