Re: Again, sorry, caching.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Date: 2002-04-14 17:16:08
Message-ID: 22306.1018804568@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> No it won't.

> Is this because NOTIFY is held for transaction end or because the
> triggers are held until transaction commit?

The former.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-14 17:20:20 Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-14 17:15:30 Re: 7.2 crash...