From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "Unified logging system" breaks access to pg_dump debug outputs |
Date: | 2020-09-17 16:53:38 |
Message-ID: | 222834.1600361618@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After further thought, I concluded that's a clearly superior solution,
>> so 0001 attached does it like that. After noting that the enum values
>> are in the opposite direction from how I thought they went, I realized
>> that "increase_level" might be a bit ambiguous, so I now propose to
>> call it pg_logging_increase_verbosity.
> I like this better too ... I've wished for extra-verbose messages from
> pg_dump in the past, and this now allows me to add something should I
> want them again.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-09-17 17:12:12 | Planner, check if can use consider HASH for groupings (src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c) |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-09-17 16:50:00 | Re: Retry Cached Remote Connections for postgres_fdw in case remote backend gets killed/goes away |