|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>|
|Subject:||Re: Role membership and DROP|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 13:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>>> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> It might be worth clarifying this point in section 5.7,
> I like your second sentence, but I think that "the right ... is inherent
> in being the ... owner" is unnecessarily complicated.
> Removing the "always" and "only" makes the apparent contradiction between
> the sentences less jarring to me.
I think it's important to emphasize that this is implicit in object
Looking at the page again, I notice that there's a para a little further
down that overlaps quite a bit with what we're discussing here, but it's
about implicit grant options rather than the right to DROP. In the
attached, I reworded that too, and moved it because it's not fully
intelligible until we've explained grant options. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||PG Doc comments form||2019-11-19 18:55:23||Difference between Bulk Load (Multiple inserts or single inserts) and COPY|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2019-11-19 15:58:13||Re: GSoD - a patch for Getting Started tutorial|
|Next Message||Thomas Munro||2019-11-19 18:58:16||Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2019-11-19 17:06:50||Re: initdb SegFault|