Re: is_array_type vs type_is_array

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is_array_type vs type_is_array
Date: 2007-06-07 05:44:43
Message-ID: 22205.1181195083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> writes:
> Was there some change in functionality reason for renaming is_array_type
> to type_is_array?

Just to sync style with type_is_enum ... there were more of the latter
than the former.

> It broke compilation of fulldisjunctions,

Sorry, but we change internal APIs every day, and twice on Sundays.
Deal with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-06-07 05:57:47 Re: is_array_type vs type_is_array
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2007-06-07 05:08:21 is_array_type vs type_is_array