Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior
Date: 2010-01-12 18:58:25
Message-ID: 22185.1263322705@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On Tuesday 12 January 2010 09:40:03 Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> So that one could do an elog(ERROR & ERROR_NO_SEND_CLIENT, .. or such?

> Do you aggree on the approach then? Do you want to do it?

Why not use the already-existing COMMERROR thing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2010-01-12 19:21:03 Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP)
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-01-12 18:55:54 Re: Writeable CTEs