| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Remove source code display from \df+? |
| Date: | 2023-03-02 22:20:15 |
| Message-ID: | 2217430.1677795615@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> [ 0001-Remove-source-code-display-from-df-v6.patch ]
Pushed after some editorialization on the test case.
One thing I noticed while testing is that if you apply \df+ to an
aggregate function, it will show "Internal name" of "aggregate_dummy".
While that's an accurate description of what's in prosrc, it seems
not especially useful and perhaps indeed confusing to novices.
So I thought about suppressing it. However, that would require
a server-version-dependent test and I wasn't quite convinced it'd
be worth the trouble. Any thoughts on that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-03-02 22:34:45 | Documentation of psql's \df no longer matches reality |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-03-02 22:06:04 | Re: buildfarm + meson |