Re: Function immutable is not during a reindex ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function immutable is not during a reindex ?
Date: 2003-07-13 15:21:06
Message-ID: 22172.1058109666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs

"Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> On: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:19 AM "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So? Sounds to me like it's working as intended.

> Well the documentation says:
> IMMUTABLE [...] If this option is given,
> any call of the function with all-constant
> arguments can be immediately replaced
> with the function value.

Note it says "can be", not "always will be". IMMUTABLE is a promise
you make to the system about the function's behavior ... not vice
versa.

> Used as default value:
> # alter table t_a alter b set default test(3);
> NOTICE: test called
> ALTER TABLE

> #\d t_a
> Table "public.t_a"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --------+---------+-----------
> a | integer |
> b | integer | default 4

This is a bug, or at least a bad idea in hindsight, and 7.4 doesn't
do it anymore.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mendola Gaetano 2003-07-13 18:08:41 Re: Function immutable is not during a reindex ?
Previous Message Andrew Biagioni 2003-07-13 14:16:33 Re: Installazione Postgres

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Szepe 2003-07-13 16:24:28 segfault at aset.c:539
Previous Message Mendola Gaetano 2003-07-13 12:12:15 Re: Function immutable is not during a reindex ?