From: | aznmedia <digz6666(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UUID datatype |
Date: | 2009-02-20 06:54:18 |
Message-ID: | 22115729.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Where can I get your committed code?
>From hibernate CVS, postgresql connector CVS or ?
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Andrew wrote:
>>
>>> I'm wondering about the timeline or plans if any for JDBC driver support
>>> of
>>> the recently added UUID datatype in PostgreSQL?
>>
>> There aren't any exact plans, but I was thinking we would map the pg uuid
>> type onto the java.util.UUID type. The only problem with that is
>> java.util.UUID only appeared in the 1.5 JDK, so we'd only be able to
>> support
>> it for some driver versions.
>
> I've committed code to CVS to support the UUID type. This is now the
> first time there's a real distinction between the 1.4 and 1.5 JDK builds.
> Previously I've been doing all JDBC3 releases with a 1.4 JDK which will
> not support java.util.UUID. I don't plan on publishing the separate
> JDBC3g (g stands for the generics JDK1.5 needs) build that is generated
> from a 1.5 build because we already have enough release versions. So
> unless there are serious objections, if people want UUID support they'll
> need to use the JDBC 4 release or build from source.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UUID-datatype-tp15518545p22115729.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Saleem EDAH-TALLY | 2009-02-20 09:30:32 | SSL - Providing client certificates |
Previous Message | Vlad Arkhipov | 2009-02-20 02:30:53 | Feature Request: some of non JDBC types should implement Comparable |