Re: Spelling change in LLVM 14 API

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Spelling change in LLVM 14 API
Date: 2021-08-22 13:22:43
Message-ID: 2210367.1629638563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> After [1], seawasp blew up[2]. I tested the following fix on LLVM 13
> and 14 (main branch ~2 days ago). Better ideas welcome.

> - if (F.getAttributes().hasFnAttribute(llvm::Attribute::NoInline))
> +#if LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR < 14
> +#define hasFnAttr hasFnAttribute
> +#endif
> +
> + if (F.getAttributes().hasFnAttr(llvm::Attribute::NoInline))

Seems like either we should push back on pointless renaming, or else
that we're not really supposed to be accessing this non-stable API.
I have no idea which of those situations applies ... but if the LLVM
guys are randomly renaming methods that *are* supposed to be
user-visible, they need re-education.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-08-22 13:29:01 Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-22 13:19:42 Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT