Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
Date: 2005-05-05 19:56:46
Message-ID: 22054.1115323006@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Although I dislike last-minute fixes, I am strongly tempted to put in
>> the ignore-datallowconn-if-standalone change in all the releases we
>> are about to make.

> That sounds very reasonable.

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael J. Robinson 2005-05-05 20:17:55 Problem setting up new users
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-05-05 19:13:56 Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-05-05 19:58:55 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-05 19:55:12 Re: Views, views, views! (long)