| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 03:31:22 |
| Message-ID: | 2205.1101958282@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, that is the logic in my patch, except that I don't check errno, I
> just call sigpending().
No, that's wrong: if there is a pending SIGPIPE that belongs to the
outer app, you'd clear it.
> There are a few writes and it seemed impossible
> to check them all.
Hmm? There is only one place this needs to be done, namely
pqsecure_write.
BTW, have you posted the patch yet or are you still working on it?
The mail server seems a bit flaky today ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 03:45:15 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-12-02 03:10:24 | Re: New compile warnings for inheritance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 03:45:15 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Jon Jensen | 2004-12-02 00:52:08 | Update for documentation on CVS |