Re: Clarify how triggers relate to transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: him(at)nathanmlong(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarify how triggers relate to transactions
Date: 2021-09-01 21:25:57
Message-ID: 2204501.1630531557@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think it'd work out best to make this a separate para after the
>> one that defines before/after/instead-of triggers. How do you
>> like the attached?

> That is better, and I like your patch. Thanks!
> Keeping paragraphs short is a good thing.

Pushed like that, then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-02 02:53:08 Re: Inaccurate usage of "which" instead of "that" in parallel.sgml
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-09-01 20:21:23 Re: Simple re-wording

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2021-09-01 21:34:32 Re: [PATCH] Support pg_ident mapping for LDAP
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2021-09-01 21:21:41 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication