AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-29 08:00:06
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA59AA@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > > AFAIK,schema is independent from user in SQL92.
> > > So default_tablespace_per_user doesn't necessarily imply
> > > default_tablespace_per_schema.
> >
> > Well, sombody must be interpreting this wrong, because
> > in Informix and Oracle the schema corresponds to the owner
> > and they say they conform to ansi in this regard.
>
> Is there really a schema:user=1:1 limitation in SQL-92 ?
> Though both SQL-86 and SQL-89 had the limitation
> SQL-92 removed it AFAIK.

As I said in another posting a user does not need to exist
for each schema. The dba can create objects under any
schema name.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-29 08:21:57 RE: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-06-29 07:44:33 AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items