| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | AW: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-21 15:00:44 |
| Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA5986@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Sure, and if the system loading it can not create the
> required symlinks
> > > because the directories don't exist, it can just skip the
> symlink step.
> >
> > What I meant is, would you still be able to create tablespaces on
> > systems without symlinks? That would seem to be a desirable feature.
>
> You could create tablespaces, but you could not point them at
> different
> drives. The issue is that we don't store the symlink location in the
> database, just the tablespace name.
You could point them to another drive if your OS allows you to mount a
filesystem under an arbitrary name, no ?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-21 15:07:20 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-21 14:55:39 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |