> My inclindation is that tablespaces should be installation-wide, but
> I'm not completely sold on it. In any case I could see wanting a
> permissions mechanism that would only allow some databases to have
> tables in a particular tablespace.
I fully second that.
> We do need to think more about how traditional Postgres databases
> fit together with SCHEMA. Maybe we wouldn't even need multiple
> databases per installation if we had SCHEMA done right.
This gives me the goose bumps. A schema is something that is below
the database hierarchy. It is the owner of a table. We lack the ability
to qualify a tablemname with an owner like "owner".tabname .
Can we please agree to that much ?
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-06-21 14:55:39|
|Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items|
|Previous:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB||Date: 2000-06-21 13:02:40|
|Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items |