AW: Berkeley DB...

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Matthias Urlichs'" <smurf(at)noris(dot)de>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Berkeley DB...
Date: 2000-05-25 15:42:50
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DA4@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> The select:
> 0.75 MySQL-MyISAM
> 0.77 MySQL-BDB
> 2.43 PostgreSQL
>
> I'll do a "real" test once the BDB support in MySQL is stable
> enough to run the MySQL benchmark suite.

It is the sequential scan timings that we would be very interested in.

create table foo (a int not null,b char(100));
create index foo_a on foo(a);
for(i=0; i<10000; i++) {
insert into foo(a,b) values( `((i*3467)%10000)` , 'fusli');
}

time this:
select count(*) from foo where b<>'not there';

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-25 15:46:31 Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Previous Message Ed Loehr 2000-05-25 15:40:19 parser oddity (t.count)