shared lib names

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: shared lib names
Date: 1999-07-16 15:19:17
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60339E07D@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Why are our shared libs called e.g. ecpg.so and not libecpg.so ?
This seems strange to me, and it also complicates the link,
since now I cannot say -lecpg and decide whether to link static or shared
with the corresponding linker flag (-bnso or -brtl on AIX)

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-16 15:34:09 Re: [HACKERS] shared lib names
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-07-16 14:49:19 Oversize proc sources (was Re: [BUGS] Backend dies creating plpgsql procedures (with reproducible example!))