Re: gram.y => preproc.y

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Date: 2008-11-13 20:57:49
Message-ID: 21981.1226609869@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
> if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to be
> an advantage.

Other than whether it *works*, you mean?

make will not be happy if it has a dependency from preproc.c to preproc.y
and preproc.y is not there. Please don't mess with this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-11-13 21:04:13 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2008-11-13 20:47:30 Re: gram.y => preproc.y