Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-20 02:46:03
Message-ID: 21937.1119235563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Can't tell whether I could find time for reviewing the docs the next
> days (more interesting for feature freeze is having fixed the
> implementation anyway).

Of the sixty-odd files that mention template1 in current CVS, only about
half are documentation. If you think a patch that patches only initdb
is enough to get this "feature" in, you are very mistaken ... even if we
were inclined to accept patches that blatantly omit documentation, which
as a rule we do not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-06-20 07:28:02 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-20 01:05:35 Re: Gist Recovery testing