Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:30:36 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ugh ... if that's currently allowed, we definitely need to fix it.
> Btw, whats the danger youre seing?
Well, I'm not sure that it would actively break anything, but we
definitely meant to disallow the case. Also, I seem to recall some
places that intuit a relation's shared marker in the opposite direction
(if it's in pg_global it must be shared), and that could definitely
cause issues if we treat a rel as shared when it isn't.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-02-28 00:21:38|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-02-27 23:49:36|
|Subject: Re: Trigger execution role (was: Triggers with DO functionality) |