Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 19:27:45
Message-ID: 21904.1238441265@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I guess that'd work but it might be overkill.

The real bottom line is that *all* the proposals for generic init
functions are overkill. We have no evidence that we need one and
no certainty about what the requirements for it would be if we did.

I think we should just do PQinitOpenSSL(2 args) and be done with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-03-30 19:34:49 Re: Unexpected Result in Windowing
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-30 19:15:39 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf