"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> we have several requests to improve ltree, particularly, people want
>> to expand class of allowed symbols and configurable separator, which is
>> hard-coded right now. Also, we discussed GiN support for ltree.
> O.k. but how does that prevent it from being in core?
Once it's in core the expectations for API stability get a lot higher ...
regards, tom lane