Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/14/17 11:14, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Do we really want the existence of
>> a function foo(int) to mean that you can't create a SQL procedure named
>> foo and taking one int argument?
> Yes, that is defined that way by the SQL standard.
Meh. OK, then it has to be one catalog.
regards, tom lane