Re: A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: a(dot)akenteva(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c
Date: 2017-11-09 16:21:26
Message-ID: 21764.1510244486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I think odd coding this was introduced recently because of the
> pg_resetxlog -> pg_resetwal renaming.

Dunno about that, but certainly somebody fat-fingered a refactoring
there. The 9.6 code looks quite different but doesn't seem to be
doing anything silly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-09 16:58:44 Re: (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-09 16:17:26 Re: A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c