From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE |
Date: | 2000-05-28 05:36:04 |
Message-ID: | 2176.959492164@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
> Here are the output from checkresults.
> ====== rules ======
> 1168d1167
> < pg_indexes | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS indexdef FROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
> 1187c1186
> < (20 rows)
> ---
>> (19 rows)
> ====== foreign_key ======
> 11a12
>> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726
> 235a237
>> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726
> I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
> hurt anything?) But what about the rules?
The NOTICEs are caused by a known omission: the foreign-key boys didn't
bother to add an outfuncs.c routine for node type FkConstraint. Should
be pretty harmless AFAIK. The rules discrepancy is much more
disturbing. Is it repeatable?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Zeugswetter | 2000-05-28 07:30:38 | RE: Berkeley DB... |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-05-28 05:30:30 | Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE |