| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time for beta2 ? |
| Date: | 2013-06-05 13:50:07 |
| Message-ID: | 21758.1370440207@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> We've almost cleared the open items list, and I'm not aware of any other
> unfixed issues in 9.3beta1. Could we make a beta2 release soon? There
> have been a bunch of recovery-related fixes since beta1, it would be
> nice to get those fixes in the hands of testers.
There are at least two initdb-forcing things on the table, which I think
we need to resolve before we push beta2:
1. The business around being able to tell whether views and foreign
tables are updatable; all of the proposals for this will require
adding/changing some pg_proc entries and probably changing system view
definitions.
2. Simon was suggesting some changes in the functions for reporting
whether a backup is in progress.
Has anyone got anything else of that ilk?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-06-05 13:56:51 | Re: Time for beta2 ? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-06-05 12:16:00 | Redesigning checkpoint_segments |