| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
| Date: | 2004-01-01 17:58:27 |
| Message-ID: | 21757.1072979907@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 03:22, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> What is needed to provide spinlock support for linux on hppa?
Possibly nothing --- can you try CVS tip? Bruce has already committed
his patch to decouple CPU and OS assumptions there, and I changed the
TAS code to be inline for gcc. AFAICS it should just work.
> I should add that 7.3.4 built OK.
For sufficiently small values of OK, perhaps so. We didn't complain
about not having spinlocks then.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-01-01 20:47:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-01-01 03:27:15 | Re: Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-01-01 20:47:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
| Previous Message | Casey Allen Shobe | 2004-01-01 17:43:44 | Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ? |