Re: idea for concurrent seqscans

"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> Assuming you're talkning about "You might wonder why we don't order all
> the regression test queries explicitly to get rid of this issue once and
> for all. The reason is that that would make the regression tests less
> useful, not more, since they'd tend to exercise query plan types that
> produce ordered results to the exclusion of those that don't.", good
> point. I can think of 2 ways around this:

> 1) Select into a temptable, then select out of it with an order by

> 2) Run the output through sort before doing the diff

> Is there any reason one of these wouldn't work?

Like I said originally, we could certainly devise a solution if we
needed to. I was just pointing out that this is a nontrivial
consideration, and I don't want to buy into it if the patch proves
to offer only marginal performance improvements.

regards, tom lane