Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done
Date: 2019-08-04 15:52:32
Message-ID: 21731.1564933952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Perhaps instead of "June" it could be the specific version number (which
> could cause some pain with the back branching?) or the "2019-06-20" release?

Putting in all the version numbers seems like a mess, but specifying
2019-06-20 would work --- or we could say "the most recent" minor
releases?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2019-08-04 15:52:36 Re: pglz performance
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-08-04 15:24:39 Re: Problem with default partition pruning