Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Date: 2002-04-30 19:28:13
Message-ID: 21723.1020194893@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> ... In any case, I can't offer a definite
> answer about the 64-bit qsort for now.

Do you need to profile it? It seemed that the 32-bit behavior for
many-equal-keys was so bad that it'd be easy to tell whether it's
fixed, just by rough overall timing of a test case...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Ferguson 2002-04-30 19:57:54 Re: Altering Database/Table Ownership
Previous Message Jillian Carroll 2002-04-30 19:09:41 Altering Database/Table Ownership

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-04-30 20:34:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-04-30 18:54:07 Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers