Re: [CORE] Automating our version-stamping a bit better

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-core(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] Automating our version-stamping a bit better
Date: 2008-06-10 18:13:38
Message-ID: 21710.1213121618@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I was thinking was just to have the script
>> print out something like
>>
>> Tagged tree as 8.3.4
>> Don't forget to run autoconf 2.59 before committing

> I like that one ...

I've checked in a script to do this --- executing
src/tools/version_stamp.pl N
at the top level of the tree should stamp everything needed, and remind
you which autoconf version to run.

Marc, you'll presumably be the primary user of this script, so would you
please try it out and make sure (a) it works for you, and (b) you like
the way it works? I don't think I used any unportable perl or sed
constructs, but let's find the problems now, not when we're trying to
wrap a release ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-10 18:23:04 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-06-10 16:49:17 Re: Overhauling GUCS