Re: Database integrity and disaster recovery

Martin Christensen <knightsofspamalot-factotum(at)mail1(dot)stofanet(dot)dk> writes:
> I've heard some rumours off Slashdot that PostgreSQL databases tend to
> corrupt more than, say, MySQL, and that disaster recovery is more
> difficult.

The MySQL people assert that, but their objectivity is, um, suspect.
I don't think I've heard any such claim from an independent third
party.

I've heard of very few cases of actual data corruption in Postgres
databases --- and several of the ones I have seen personally were
eventually traced to flaky disk or disk-controller hardware, not
software faults. We have had some problems with index corruption
(although those bugs are progressively getting cleaned out), but the
basic table format is mighty simple and hard to do much damage to.

Recovery from a corrupted index on a user table is pretty easy: drop
and recreate the index. Corrupted system indexes are nastier, since
dropping them may disable normal database operations entirely.
Beginning in 7.0 there is a REINDEX command that you can invoke in
standalone mode if you find yourself in that position. It's a pretty
rare problem, however.

regards, tom lane