| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Badger <bruce_badger(at)badgerse(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version |
| Date: | 2003-08-29 20:54:51 |
| Message-ID: | 21645.1062190491@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> Tom, just curious as to what your resistance is to this feature? ISTM
> that making this admin modifiable doesn't hurt anyone and could be
> helpful to some people.
Admin modifiable at what level? I don't believe that the "feature" is
valuable enough to warrant defining, implementing, and documenting a GUC
variable, let alone adding a pg_hba.conf column which one could imagine
someone wanting instead. I suggested a simple source code change, and
I think that's quite sufficient when we have only one request for it
with a not-very-compelling rationale. There are much more useful tweaks
(eg, altering BLCKSZ) that we have equivalent levels of support for.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Battles | 2003-08-30 01:40:09 | pgadmin3-0.9.1 wxwindows build woes utils/misc.cpp:389: error: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-08-29 20:39:39 | Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version |