Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Badger <bruce_badger(at)badgerse(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version
Date: 2003-08-29 20:39:39
Message-ID: 1062189579.3390.576.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Badger <bruce_badger(at)badgerse(dot)com> writes:
> > Unfortunately, I am not in a position to initiate a change in the StORE
> > schema. StORE is also used with other RDBMSs, and the users of those
> > have no incentive to bless a change in the schema just to help out the
> > PostgreSQL users.
>
> Hm, I must have misunderstood what you wanted to do, because it sure
> sounded like a schema change to me. But anyway --- although I do not
> want to offer this as a supported option, there is nothing to stop you
> from altering PG_PROTOCOL_EARLIEST in your build. See
> src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h.
>

Tom, just curious as to what your resistance is to this feature? ISTM
that making this admin modifiable doesn't hurt anyone and could be
helpful to some people.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-29 20:54:51 Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2003-08-29 18:54:32 Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version