Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure
Date: 2017-11-21 21:15:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> or just
>> ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)

> Oh, yeah. That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same
> value more than once.

Sold; I'll go make it so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-21 21:19:51 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Previous Message Thomas Rosenstein 2017-11-21 21:13:16 Re: Logical Replication and triggers