| From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table |
| Date: | 2010-05-12 10:01:24 |
| Message-ID: | 215648.49463.qm@web23601.mail.ird.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Did you not mention that this server was a slony slave at some point though?
Just because you have removed slony, and the error comes from postgresql itself does not mean the corruption was not caused by misuse of slony.
--- On Wed, 12/5/10, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table
> To: "Alban Hertroys" <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Date: Wednesday, 12 May, 2010, 10:57
> no it is not slony related.
> It is a postgresql problem.
>
> my original post:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-05/msg00402.php
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2010-05-12 10:05:35 | Re: 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2010-05-12 10:00:13 | Re: 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table |