Re: Re: "Oracle's ROWNUM"

Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> ... For example rownum = 2 will return
> no rows because the first row returned by the query has by definition a
> rownum of 1, but the where predicate prevents this row from being
> returned, thus it can never get to a rownum value of 2 to satisfy the
> where predicate.

So in other words, a construct accessible in the WHERE clause is defined
in terms of what happens far downstream of WHERE. This cannot possibly
have sane behavior. I won't even ask about join queries...

AFAICT, LIMIT/OFFSET do the same job in a much more logical fashion.
Let's stick with those, and not try to copy the more brain-dead aspects
of Oracle.

regards, tom lane