From: | Vitaly V(dot) Voronov <wizard_1024(at)tut(dot)by> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15144: *** glibc detected *** postgres: postgres smsconsole [local] SELECT: double free or corruption (!pre |
Date: | 2018-04-16 18:05:37 |
Message-ID: | 2139451523901937@web24o.yandex.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hello, Peter.
Pgpool used only from App side at another server.
Zabbix running its queries directly at database server.
16.04.2018, 21:03, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> and tuplestore_end does this:
>> if (state->myfile)
>> BufFileClose(state->myfile);
>> without setting anything in state to NULL; so we're relying on the
>> caller fs->tstore to null to avoid repeated tuplestore_end calls. I
>> can't see any way for this to misbehave, but maybe the funcstate appears
>> more than once in the PerFuncState array, and we clean it correctly the
>> first time around and then invoke the tuplestore_end() the second time
>> to the memory that was previously freed? I think this makes no sense
>> unless we share FunctionScanPerFuncState elements -- do we?
>
> I have no reason to think that we do. Offhand, I find it more likely
> that some executor slot that imagines that it owns the tuple frees the
> tuple once, which is followed by a call to tuplestore_end() that frees
> the same tuple a second time (a double-free). As I mentioned, we've
> seen several bugs of that general variety in both tuplestore and
> tuplesort in the past. Some of these have been very subtle.
>
> Note that pgpool is involved here. I don't know much about pgpool, and
> maybe that's totally irrelevant.
>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-16 18:35:05 | Re: BUG #15144: *** glibc detected *** postgres: postgres smsconsole [local] SELECT: double free or corruption (!pre |
Previous Message | Vitaly V. Voronov | 2018-04-16 18:03:35 | Re: BUG #15144: *** glibc detected *** postgres: postgres smsconsole [local] SELECT: double free or corruption (!pre |