| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stěhule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Date: | 2014-04-07 16:28:12 |
| Message-ID: | 21349.1396888092@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In other words, let's revert the whole refactoring of this file to
> create reg*_guts functions, and instead just copy the relevant logic
> for the name lookups into the new functions.
The main discomfort I'd had with this patch was the amount of refactoring
it did; that made it hard to verify and I wasn't feeling like it made for
much net improvement in cleanliness. If we can do it without that, and
have only as much duplicate code as you suggest, then +1.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-07 16:36:58 | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-07 16:18:04 | Re: Including replication slot data in base backups |