| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generating function default settings from pg_proc.dat |
| Date: | 2026-02-18 19:33:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2134281.1771443182@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Fair enough. But in the interest of keeping a single source of truth, what
> if we reversed the process, having a build-time perl script parse
> system_functions.sql to build a minimal pg_proc.dat-like file just for
> bootstrap? We would probably want to break up system_functions.sql into
> several files, (admin functions go here, adt-related functions go there,
> etc), but we'd have total clarity on all function definitions, and we
> wouldn't have to modify the generation of pg_proc.dat unless a new function
> syntax feature affected bootstrapping.
Seems like an awful lot of work compared to the benefit. We are
down to two kinds of entries in system_functions.sql:
1. New-style SQL-language functions. To my mind, for those functions
system_functions.sql *is* the source of truth; the pg_proc entry is
vestigial and present mostly to reserve the OID. If we decided it's
okay to not have nailed-down OIDs for those functions, we could drop
their pg_proc entries altogether. But even as things stand, those
entries all say
prosrc => 'see system_functions.sql' },
which I think makes it pretty clear where the primary definition is.
2. GRANT/REVOKE operations. Andres muttered something about trying
to integrate those into pg_proc.dat too, and I'm going to go look
at the idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-02-18 19:41:51 | Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2026-02-18 19:32:06 | Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE? |