| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Date: | 2003-02-18 06:00:12 |
| Message-ID: | 21340.1045548012@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I thought folks wanted them to fail if they conflicted so that they
> could know for sure how to derive such names definitively. Is that
> accurate?
It sort of bothers me that this patch would make it impossible to
predict with certainty the index names associated with a table.
But I haven't got a better idea...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-18 06:10:01 | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-18 05:52:01 | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-18 06:10:01 | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-18 05:47:36 | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names |