| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl options |
| Date: | 2007-01-07 02:27:55 |
| Message-ID: | 2127.1168136875@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Certainly postgres has plenty of long ones. And I don't know why
> I don't see them.
postgres/postmaster accept --any-guc-variable=value. AFAIR all the
single-letter options these days are equivalent to one of those.
There's not anything else to do there, except perhaps fix the
documentation (I'm not clear on why Table 17-1 is where it is and
not on the postgres command reference page).
I can't get excited about inventing short options for pg_config.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:32:43 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:20:53 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |