Re: float4/float8/int64 passed by value with tsearchfixup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Zoltan Boszormenyi" <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Hans-Juergen Schoenig" <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: float4/float8/int64 passed by value with tsearchfixup
Date: 2008-04-20 15:57:07
Message-ID: 21268.1208707027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> So are you killing V0 for non-integral types? Because if not we should keep
> some sacrificial module to the regression tests to use to test for this
> problem.

Well, we could potentially continue to have, say, the oldstyle
geo_distance function used when not FLOAT8PASSBYVAL. Not clear how
useful that really is though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-04-20 18:01:22 Re: Coding standards
Previous Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2008-04-20 14:54:28 Re: float4/float8/int64 passed by value with tsearchfixup