| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |
| Date: | 2013-05-01 14:06:55 |
| Message-ID: | 2121.1367417215@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> I am concerned that the deafening lack of any replies to my original
> message is a result of folk glancing at your original quick reply and
> thinking... incomplete problem spec...ignore... when that is not that
> case - yes I should have muttered "9.2" in the original email, but we
> have covered that now.
No, I think it's more that we're trying to get to beta, and so anything
that looks like new development is getting shuffled to folks' "to
look at later" queues. The proposed patch is IMO a complete nonstarter
anyway; but I'm not sure what a less bogus solution would look like.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2013-05-01 14:26:53 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2013-05-01 13:55:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make fast promotion the default promotion mode. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2013-05-01 14:12:36 | Re: Deterioration in performance when query executed in multi threads |
| Previous Message | Anne Rosset | 2013-05-01 14:05:06 | Deterioration in performance when query executed in multi threads |